continuist/theory
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update Argument_for_EMR.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
continuist 2025-07-21 20:59:08 -04:00
parent 537ee94432
commit f32103f4e1
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
Argument_for_EMR.md
View file

@ -3,12 +3,18 @@
## Step 1: From Formal Describability to Ontological Identity
1. A **formal system** is a set of axioms, inference rules, and symbols capable of expressing truths about a domain.
2. If a domain (like reality, from the largest macrostructures to the smallest microstructures) can be **fully and self-sufficiently described** by a formal system — such that no semantic interpretation or metaphysical foundation is required beyond that system — then **nothing external** to the system is needed to account for the domain’s structure.
2. If a domain (like reality) can be **fully and self-sufficiently described** by a formal system — such that no semantic interpretation or metaphysical foundation is required beyond that system — then **nothing external** to the system is needed to account for the domain’s structure.
3. In such a case, the system is not merely a model of the domain; it **is** the domain in structure and function.
**Conclusion 1**: If something is fully and self-sufficiently describable by a formal system, it **is** that formal system in ontological terms.
## Step 2: Empiricism Treats Reality as a Formal System
## Step 2: Material Embedding Principle
1. A complete and exhaustively accurate model of the universe must be materially embedded within the universe and composed of the same physical constituents, subject to the same physical laws and limitations, in order to fully instantiate all features of that universe. For example, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle would require the universe itself in order to accurately model the universe.
2. Such a model of the universe is possible in principle since the universe exists.
3. Therefore, the universe itself such a fully and self-sufficiently described formal system.
## Step 3: Empiricism Treats Reality as a Formal System
1. Empiricism defines reality as the **totality of all true facts**, whether known or knowable in principle.
2. These facts are **formalizable** — expressible in statements, equations, or logical propositions.
@ -17,7 +23,7 @@
**Conclusion 2**: Empiricism treats reality as a **self-contained formal system** — precisely the kind of system described in Step 1.
## Step 3: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem Applies
## Step 4: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem Applies
1. Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem: any consistent formal system expressive enough to contain arithmetic is **incomplete** — there are true statements contained within it that it cannot prove.
2. Physical reality includes arithmetic (e.g., counting, causality, measurement), so any formal system modeling it must include arithmetic.
@ -26,7 +32,7 @@
**Conclusion 3**: Empiricism is **incompatible** with the existence of a complete and consistent ToE, and therefore **cannot be correct** as a fundamental metaphysical framework.
## Step 4: The Collapse of Empiricism Leaves PSR as the Only Coherent Framework
## Step 5: The Collapse of Empiricism Leaves PSR as the Only Coherent Framework
1. Rejection of empiricism eliminates the epistemic framework that allows for brute facts without justification.
2. Two options remain:
@ -36,7 +42,7 @@
**Conclusion 4**: PSR is the **only coherent explanatory principle** left once empiricism is rejected.
## Step 5: Only EMR Satisfies the PSR Without Exception
## Step 6: Only EMR Satisfies the PSR Without Exception
1. Any theory that excludes certain possibilities (e.g., only consistent worlds exist, only lawful structures exist) must explain **why** those exclusions hold.
2. If those constraints cannot be explained from within the theory, they are **unjustified assumptions** — violating the PSR.