continuist/theory
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update Argument_for_EMR.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
continuist 2025-07-21 20:06:10 -04:00
parent f59b49314c
commit 7375c0733d
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
Argument_for_EMR.md
View file

@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
# Proof of Extended Modal Realism
# Full Argument for EMR as the Only Coherent Theory of Everything
## Step 1: From Formal Describability to Ontological Identity ## Step 1: From Formal Describability to Ontological Identity
@ -19,10 +18,10 @@
## Step 3: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem Applies ## Step 3: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem Applies
1. Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem: any consistent formal system expressive enough to contain arithmetic is **incomplete** — there are true statements it cannot prove. 1. Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem: any consistent formal system expressive enough to contain arithmetic is **incomplete** — there are true statements contained within it that it cannot prove.
2. Physical reality includes arithmetic (e.g., counting, causality, measurement), so any formal system modeling it must include arithmetic. 2. Physical reality includes arithmetic (e.g., counting, causality, measurement), so any formal system modeling it must include arithmetic.
3. Therefore, if reality is a formal system (as empiricism claims), it must be either **incomplete** or **inconsistent**. 3. Therefore, if reality is a formal system (as empiricism claims), it must be either **incomplete** or **inconsistent**.
4. But a **Theory of Everything (ToE)** must be **both complete and consistent** by definition. 4. But a **Theory of Everything (ToE)** must be **both complete and consistent** by definition, otherwise it cannot be a ToE.
**Conclusion 3**: Empiricism is **incompatible** with the existence of a complete and consistent ToE, and therefore **cannot be correct** as a fundamental metaphysical framework. **Conclusion 3**: Empiricism is **incompatible** with the existence of a complete and consistent ToE, and therefore **cannot be correct** as a fundamental metaphysical framework.
@ -30,7 +29,7 @@
1. Rejection of empiricism eliminates the epistemic framework that allows for brute facts without justification. 1. Rejection of empiricism eliminates the epistemic framework that allows for brute facts without justification.
2. Two options remain: 2. Two options remain:
- (A) **Affirm PSR**: every fact has a reason, demanding total intelligibility. - (A) **Affirm the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR)**: every fact has a reason, demanding total intelligibility.
- (B) **Deny both empiricism and PSR**: accept brute facts arbitrarily, abandoning explanation. - (B) **Deny both empiricism and PSR**: accept brute facts arbitrarily, abandoning explanation.
3. Option B collapses into **metaphysical incoherence**, as it cannot provide any foundation for explanation or knowledge. 3. Option B collapses into **metaphysical incoherence**, as it cannot provide any foundation for explanation or knowledge.